First off- Dave welcome back, good to see you stayed.
Second I would like to start off by saying that I hate government interference in my life and would like to see things done to prevent making "banning" anything but the worst offenders necessary- transit survival problems, VERY specialized diets that CANNOT be provided for (not just because they are difficult) or threatened species. I particularly like the idea of special order species and yes, taxation. I realize that I am new to the hobby and do not know nearly as much as many of you who have been around for the last two decades, but I like to beleive that in almost all thing there is a happy middle ground (sound like a politician, don't I?)
I do like to think that special ordered fish will find a suitable home with knowledgeable hobbyists who can provide the care necessary to their survival. I also think that people who are wanting a shrimpfish or the likes should have access to them,(provided that they are not a threatened species) but not just by going into the LFS. If you are willing to put the money and time into keeping the fish and researching it then by all means, you should be able to acquire it if it is plentiful on the reefs. (with the above mentioned exceptions.)
I do NOT like the idea of taxation just for taxation sake with the funds going to general revenue so it would be nice to see it going to a special fund. (I know up here the chances of that are slim- they want everything in a "re-elect the Liberals slush fund,” but I can dream
) The taxation I speak of would apply to wild- caught specimens which are able to be tank-raised and which are readily available. This would have the effect of driving up the price so there was no longer a large price advantage to the hobbyist in buying wild animals and in an ideal world provide funds to monitor the reefs from the hobbyists who are putting pressure on them.
I am also not sure that there are enough captive- raised specimens available at this time to supply the industry and this would allow a fair chance to ensure the supply of clams etc... while giving incentive to "farmers."
Between this and "special order species" I believe that the strain on the reef could be reduced to the point where it is sustainable and still able to provide the countries which have them with revenue. Just as I do not disagree with harvesting trees- but I do with clear cutting forests, so to do I believe that harvesting coral and fish should be allowed, but allowed only when it is far under the threshold of sustainability.
Mary- I realize that voluntary taxation is not going to be accepted by the industry, but hey- its what I feel is best
.
Good-night all.
[ December 16, 2001: Message edited by: danny150 ]</p>